Why the study?
Does LA-GLS-guided preventive management improve atrial function and blood pressure control in adults with untreated or insufficiently controlled hypertension?
Population
120 adults aged 40–65 years with untreated or clinic-based insufficiently controlled hypertension.
Comparison
Standard hypertension management plus… vs Standard hypertension management.
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
12 months
Key result
LA-GLS-guided preventive management improved blood pressure control compared to standard management (80% vs 65%, p=0.04) in adults with hypertension.
Authors
Loading...
Associated with higher BP control rates; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
RCT (n=120)
Does LA-GLS-guided preventive management improve atrial function and blood pressure control in adults with untreated or insufficiently controlled hypertension?
Absolute Event Rate: 80% vs 65%
p-value: p=0.04
Incorporating LA-GLS into the follow-up of hypertensive patients improves atrial function and blood pressure control, potentially reducing the incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation.
Malidze et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in arterial hypertension (n=120). LA-GLS-guided evaluation and targeted interventions vs. standard hypertension management was evaluated on Blood pressure control (p=0.04). LA-GLS-guided preventive management improved blood pressure control compared to standard management (80% vs 65%, p=0.04) in adults with hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: