Why the study?
Does eccentric cycling training improve peak oxygen consumption and functional capacity compared to concentric cycling in patients with heart failure?
Population
70 patients with heart failure (mean LVEF 31 ± 10%), mean age 57 ± 13 years, 20% female.
Comparison
Eccentric cycling training vs Conventional concentric cycling training
Design
RCT, 1:1
Follow-up
14 weeks
Key result
Both eccentric and concentric cycling significantly improved peak oxygen consumption (P=0.002) and 6-minute walk distance (P<0.001) in patients with heart failure.
Authors
Loading...
Eccentric cycling offers a viable alternative for improving VO2 peak in heart failure; extends RCT evidence for varied exercise modalities in cardiac rehab.
RCT (n=70)
1:1
Does eccentric cycling training improve peak oxygen consumption and functional capacity compared to concentric cycling in patients with heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 19.1% vs 19.8%
p-value: p=0.002
Eccentric cycling is an effective alternative to conventional concentric cycling for improving aerobic and functional capacity in heart failure patients, with the added benefit of lower perceived exertion.
Stauborg et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in heart failure (HF) (n=70). Eccentric cycling vs. Concentric cycling was evaluated on peak oxygen consumption (V̇O 2 peak) (p=0.002). Both eccentric and concentric cycling significantly improved peak oxygen consumption (P=0.002) and 6-minute walk distance (P<0.001) in patients with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: