Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 2, 2025Open Access

The Impact of Clinical Reasoning Curriculum on Internal Medicine Residents: A Mixed Methods Approach

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AAAmer Aldamouk

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Mixed methods approach shows enhanced diagnostic accuracy among internal medicine residents, indicating potential curriculum benefits.

Key Points

  • The curriculum significantly enhanced residents' clinical reasoning skills, improving overall performance and confidence.
  • Statistical results show 88% satisfaction and 58.82% strongly agreed it improved diagnostic efficiency.
  • Mixed-methods approach involving 41 residents highlighted both quantitative skill assessments and qualitative experiences.
  • Findings suggest further optimization of the curriculum is needed for diverse learning needs and long-term patient outcomes.

Cite This Study

Amer Aldamouk (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de5d9c83cbc991d0a20551https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7328148/v1
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Rashes and reflection: a novel curriculum using clinical reasoning to teach ambulatory dermatology to internal medicine residents2025
  2. 2Empowering undergraduate medical students with clinical reasoning skills2025
  3. 3Treatment-focused clinical reasoning in medical students: relationship with academic success and professional commitment2025
  4. 4Clinical cases created by Medical students in the development of clinical reasoning: a systematic review2025
  5. 5A115 “Chest pain in simulation is always an MI” - Developing diagnostic reasoning and dispelling simulation myths with foundation trainees2024