September 10, 2025WASKITA Jurnal Pendidikan Nilai dan Pembangunan KarakterOpen Access

Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in Civic Education Textbook Evaluation Instruments

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

DSDestriana SaraswatiUniversity of Brawijaya NFNoveria Anggraeni FiajiUniversity of Brawijaya PZPrima ZulvarinaUniversity of Brawijaya

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Descriptive qualitative research reveals varied distribution of HOTS components in civic education materials, suggesting further improvement is needed.

Key Points

The study shows varied distribution of higher order thinking skills components in evaluation instruments.
Evaluation of the 2016 Civics Education textbook revealed critical thinking at 35.6% and creative thinking at 11.8%.
Analysis employed a systematic literature study method using predetermined HOTS criteria and indicators.
Findings highlight the need for a more balanced approach, especially in creative thinking and evaluative abilities.

Cite This Study

Saraswati et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c2409bb210217d6479bdeb https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.waskita.2025.009.01.4

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Descriptive qualitative research reveals varied distribution of HOTS components in civic education materials, suggesting further improvement is needed.

Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in Civic Education Textbook Evaluation Instruments

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in Civic Education Textbook Evaluation Instruments

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider