Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 6, 2025

Pilot Randomized Trial of Two Food Purchasing Interventions in Hypertensive Individuals in New Orleans: An American Heart Association Food is Medicine Initiative

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MTManasi TannuRYRebecca YoungABAmanda Brucker

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Pilot trial compares food purchasing interventions in hypertensive patients, indicating better engagement with in-store vouchers.

Key Points

  • No significant difference in fruit and vegetable consumption between online and in-store voucher groups was found.
  • Both groups experienced a 20% increase in fruit and vegetable consumption, suggesting an overall positive trend.
  • In-store voucher utilization exceeded 90%, while online usage was under 64%, highlighting preference differences.
  • Engagement with educational materials was higher in the in-store group, emphasizing the need for accessible interventions.

Cite This Study

Tannu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0fa0e6551bb0af8d1760https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.01.25332844
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of a Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Prescription Program in Rural America2025
  2. 2Assessing the Effect of a Food Voucher on the Dietary Intake of Patients with Diabetes Using the Canadian Diet History Questionnaire III: A Randomized Control Trial2025
  3. 3Healthy Food Benefit Programs, Fruit and Vegetable Consumption, and Food Security2025
  4. 4Systematic review of fruit and vegetable voucher interventions for pregnant women and families with young children2025
  5. 52309-P: VeggieRx and GroceryRx Produce Prescription Programs Evaluation in South Carolina2026