Population
Patients with heart failure requiring cardiac implantable electronic devices for bradyarrhythmias, cardiac…
Comparison
Cardiac implantable electronic devices vs Conventional right ventricular pacing or…
Design
Review
Key result
Cardiac implantable electronic devices, including conduction system pacing and novel defibrillators, are integral to heart failure management, though adoption is challenged by limited randomized evidence.
Authors
Loading...
Biventricular pacing remains first-line; leaves open adoption of left bundle branch area pacing pending randomized trials.
This review highlights the evolving landscape of device therapy in heart failure, emphasizing the shift towards physiological conduction system pacing and the need for ongoing randomized trials to establish the clinical benefit of these emerging technologies.
Žižek et al. (2026) conducted a review in Heart Failure. Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) was evaluated. Cardiac implantable electronic devices, including conduction system pacing and novel defibrillators, are integral to heart failure management, though adoption is challenged by limited randomized evidence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: