Leadless and extravascular rhythm devices demonstrate high implant success, low infection risk, and effective performance.

Gala et al. (2026) conducted a review in Cardiac rhythm management. Leadless and extravascular cardiac rhythm management systems vs. Traditional transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices was evaluated on Performance, complications, and patient selection. Leadless and extravascular cardiac rhythm management systems demonstrate high implantation success, low infection risk, and effective pacing and defibrillation.