Why the study?
Does a 3-month individualized nurse-led intervention improve health outcomes and quality of life in adults with heart failure?
Population
220 adults with heart failure (n=110 per group)
Comparison
3-month individualized nurse-led program… vs Routine nursing care
Design
Other, odd-even allocation method
Follow-up
3 months
Key result
A 3-month individualized nurse-led intervention significantly reduced adverse events compared to routine care (6.36% vs. 20.0%; p=0.006) in patients with heart failure.
Authors
Loading...
Hypothesis-generating for nurse-led HF support; leaves open benefits versus routine care in larger trials.
RCT (n=220)
Odd-even allocation method
No
Does a 3-month individualized nurse-led intervention improve health outcomes and quality of life in adults with heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 6.36% vs 20%
p-value: p=0.006
An individualized, nurse-led intervention integrating nutrition, exercise, and psychosocial support improves symptoms, cardiac function, and quality of life while reducing adverse events in heart failure patients.
Liu et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Heart failure (n=220). Individualized nurse-led intervention vs. Routine nursing care was evaluated on Adverse events (p=0.006). A 3-month individualized nurse-led intervention significantly reduced adverse events compared to routine care (6.36% vs. 20.0%; p=0.006) in patients with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: