Why the study?
Does exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation reduce hospitalization risk in people with coronary heart disease, and is this mediated by improvements in health-related quality of life?
Population
3,959 people with coronary heart disease (pooled individual participant data from 5 RCTs published since 2010)
Comparison
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ExCR) vs Usual care
Design
Meta-analysis, Randomized to ExCR or usual care in the original trials
Follow-up
1 and 2 years
Key result
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation significantly reduced 2-year all-cause hospitalization risk (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.43-0.87), an effect mediated by improvements in health-related quality of life.
Authors
Loading...
HRQoL improvements mediate ExCR's effect on CHD hospitalizations; extends mechanistic understanding from pooled RCTs.
Meta-Analysis (n=3,959)
randomized
Yes
Does exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation reduce hospitalization risk in people with coronary heart disease, and is this mediated by improvements in health-related quality of life?
Hazard Ratio: 0.61 (95% CI 0.43–0.87)
Improvements in physical and mental health-related quality of life significantly mediate the reduction in hospitalizations seen with exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease.
Koning et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in coronary heart disease (n=3,959). Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ExCR) vs. Usual care was evaluated on 2-year all-cause hospitalisation risk (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43-0.87). Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation significantly reduced 2-year all-cause hospitalization risk (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.43-0.87), an effect mediated by improvements in health-related quality of life.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: