Why the study?
Does urban versus suburban residence affect anticoagulation utilization and medication-dispensing patterns in older adults with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Population
302 older adults diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation via electrocardiogram during 2020 routine…
Comparison
Urban community residence vs Suburban community residence
Design
Cross-sectional
Key result
Among older adults with non-valvular atrial fibrillation at high risk for stroke, the overall anticoagulation utilization rate was 30.5%, with no significant difference between urban and suburban communities.
Authors
Loading...
Disparities in anticoagulation for urban vs suburban older adults with AF warrant equity-focused attention; cross-sectional data leaves open causes and outcome effects.
Cross-Sectional (n=302)
Yes
Does urban versus suburban residence affect anticoagulation utilization and medication-dispensing patterns in older adults with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
p-value: p=>0.05
Anticoagulation management for older NVAF patients in Chinese community settings remains suboptimal, with no significant disparity in standardized treatment rates between urban and suburban high-risk patients.
Duan et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=302). Urban community setting vs. Suburban community setting was evaluated on Overall prevalence of anticoagulant utilization among high-risk patients (p=>0.05). Among older adults with non-valvular atrial fibrillation at high risk for stroke, the overall anticoagulation utilization rate was 30.5%, with no significant difference between urban and suburban communities.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: