Why the study?
Does the location of titin truncating variants affect clinical phenotype and prognosis in patients with TTN-induced cardiomyopathy?
Population
467 phenotypically affected carriers of pathogenic or likely pathogenic titin truncating variants, 81%…
Comparison
Titin truncating variant location vs Comparison between variant locations and…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
median 83 months
Key result
M-band TTN truncating variants were associated with a higher risk of sudden cardiac death or major ventricular arrhythmias compared to Z/I-band and A-band variants (45% vs 23% vs 12%; P=0.001).
Authors
Loading...
TTNtv location should not guide DCM risk stratification; leaves open whether position influences outcomes beyond molecular mechanisms.
Observational (n=467)
Yes
Does the location of titin truncating variants affect clinical phenotype and prognosis in patients with TTN-induced cardiomyopathy?
The location of titin truncating variants independently predicts the risk of sudden cardiac death and major ventricular arrhythmias, with M-band variants carrying the highest risk, suggesting variant location should guide personalized risk stratification.
Perotto et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Titin-Induced Cardiomyopathy (n=467). TTN truncating variant location (M-band, Z/I-band, A-band) vs. Between-group comparison of variant locations was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality and heart transplantation. M-band TTN truncating variants were associated with a higher risk of sudden cardiac death or major ventricular arrhythmias compared to Z/I-band and A-band variants (45% vs 23% vs 12%; P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: