Why the study?
Does radiofrequency catheter ablation effectively reduce PVC burden and facilitate return to sport in competitive versus leisure-time athletes without structural heart disease?
Population
100 athletes aged ≥14 years with idiopathic premature ventricular contractions, preserved left ventricular…
Comparison
Radiofrequency catheter ablation using a 3D… vs Comparison between competitive athletes and…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
3-6 months for Holter monitoring, 9-15 months for clinical…
Key result
Following catheter ablation for idiopathic PVCs, competitive athletes achieved a lower follow-up PVC burden compared to leisure-time athletes (median 34.5 vs 274 PVCs/24 h; p=0.006).
Authors
Loading...
CA may support return to sport after ablation in athletes with PVCs; leaves open need for prospective trials to confirm outcomes.
Cohort (n=100)
No
Does radiofrequency catheter ablation effectively reduce PVC burden and facilitate return to sport in competitive versus leisure-time athletes without structural heart disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 34.5% vs 274%
p-value: p=0.006
Radiofrequency catheter ablation is a safe and highly effective treatment for idiopathic PVCs in athletes without structural heart disease, significantly reducing arrhythmic burden and facilitating return to sport.
Cardinali et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (n=100). Competitive athlete status vs. Leisure-time athlete status was evaluated on PVC burden reduction (p=0.006). Following catheter ablation for idiopathic PVCs, competitive athletes achieved a lower follow-up PVC burden compared to leisure-time athletes (median 34.5 vs 274 PVCs/24 h; p=0.006).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: