Why the study?
Do T1D-specific cardiovascular risk models (ST1RE and Scottish-Swedish) better predict subclinical atherosclerosis compared to 2019 ESC guidelines in asymptomatic adults with type 1 diabetes?
Population
101 asymptomatic adults with type 1 diabetes without a history of cardiovascular disease, mean age 45.3 ±…
Comparison
Type 1 Diabetes-specific cardiovascular risk… vs 2019 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines…
Design
Cross-sectional, Readers of CCTA were blinded to the patients' clinical data
Key result
The ST1RE and Scottish-Swedish risk scores strongly discriminated imaging-defined subclinical atherosclerosis in asymptomatic adults with type 1 diabetes, with AUCs of 0.899 and 0.907, respectively.
Authors
Loading...
Indicates high subclinical atherosclerosis burden; leaves open whether routine imaging refines risk stratification in similar patients.
Cross-Sectional (n=101)
No
Do T1D-specific cardiovascular risk models (ST1RE and Scottish-Swedish) better predict subclinical atherosclerosis compared to 2019 ESC guidelines in asymptomatic adults with type 1 diabetes?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.899 (ST1RE) and 0.907 (Scottish-Swedish)
Type 1 diabetes-specific cardiovascular risk scores (ST1RE and Scottish-Swedish) accurately identify subclinical atherosclerosis in asymptomatic adults with T1D, significantly outperforming standard 2019 ESC guidelines.
Molinari et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 1 Diabetes (n=101). T1D-specific cardiovascular risk models (ST1RE and Scottish-Swedish risk score) was evaluated on Composite imaging endpoint (any coronary plaque on CCTA and/or maximum carotid intima-media thickness ≥1.5 mm) (AUC 0.899 (ST1RE) and 0.907 (Scottish-Swedish)). The ST1RE and Scottish-Swedish risk scores strongly discriminated imaging-defined subclinical atherosclerosis in asymptomatic adults with type 1 diabetes, with AUCs of 0.899 and 0.907, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: