Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 5, 2011New England Journal of MedicineOpen Access

Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

CSCraig R. SmithMLMartin B. LeonMMMichael J. Mack

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Smith et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2b60994fb8db3a6d1421fdhttps://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1103510
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Decision-making in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: why are so many denied surgery?2005 · 1,118 citations
  2. 2Early experience with percutaneous transcatheter implantation of heart valve prosthesis for the treatment of end-stage inoperable patients with calcific aortic stenosis2004 · 647 citations
  3. 3Procedural and 30-day outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the third generation (18 Fr) CoreValve ReValving System: results from the multicentre, expanded evaluation registry 1-year following CE mark approval2008 · 632 citations
  4. 4Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Who Cannot Undergo Surgery2010 · 7,239 citations
  5. 5Cerebral Embolism Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation2010 · 298 citations