Why the study?
Does ACEi/ARB initiation reduce all-cause mortality compared to beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers in adults with incident gastrointestinal malignancy and new-onset hypertension?
Population
16,880 adults with incident gastrointestinal malignancy who developed new-onset hypertension requiring…
Comparison
ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers… vs Beta-blocker or calcium channel blocker initiation
Design
Cohort
Key result
ACEi/ARB initiation was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared to beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers in patients with gastrointestinal malignancy (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.77-0.90; p<0.001).
Authors
Loading...
Initiation of ACEi/ARB for incident hypertension in patients with gastrointestinal malignancy is associated with improved survival and reduced acute kidney injury compared to beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers.
Cohort (n=16,880)
Yes
Does ACEi/ARB initiation reduce all-cause mortality compared to beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers in adults with incident gastrointestinal malignancy and new-onset hypertension?
Effect estimate: HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.77-0.90)
p-value: p=<0.001
Initiation of ACEi/ARB for incident hypertension in patients with gastrointestinal malignancy is associated with improved survival and reduced acute kidney injury compared to beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers.
Dapke et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Gastrointestinal malignancy and incident hypertension (n=16,880). ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARB) vs. Beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers (BB/CCB) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.90, p=<0.001). ACEi/ARB initiation was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared to beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers in patients with gastrointestinal malignancy (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.77-0.90; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: