Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
December 2, 2025BMC PsychiatryOpen Access

A secondary exploratory study of associations between patient- and clinician-reported clinical outcomes and fidelity for four evidence-based psychosis treatments

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

EHEspen W. Haugom

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Exploratory study reveals no positive association between fidelity and patient-reported outcomes in psychosis treatments.

Key Points

  • No positive associations between fidelity and clinical outcomes in psychosis treatments observed.
  • Fidelity assessment followed a cluster-randomized controlled trial design with 325 patients.
  • Analysis utilized linear mixed models to investigate associations over 18 months.
  • Findings highlight the need for larger samples and better alignment of outcome measures with evidence-based practices.

Cite This Study

Espen W. Haugom (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692e3d8d6c9b3ab28c18764bhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07566-w
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effectiveness of implementing family involvement on patient outcomes in individuals with psychotic disorders: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2Fidelity, Implementation Determinants, and Patient-Level Outcomes Following Initial Implementation of NAVIGATE in the Early Psychosis Intervention—Spreading Evidence-Based Treatment (EPI-SET) Study2025
  3. 3Providers’ Perceptions of Trauma-Focused EBT/EBP Implementation Fidelity: Implementation Process and Individual Influences2025
  4. 4Characterizing Fidelity Monitoring Practices in Community Behavioral Health Care2025
  5. 5Effectiveness of evidence-based nursing interventions in the management of patients with schizophrenia2025