Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 15, 2025

Analisis Yuridis Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika Golongan I Bukan Tanaman

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

YTYarioni Grace Telaumbanua

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Normative research highlights flaws in the punishment for narcotics offenders, indicating a misapplication of legal principles.

Key Points

  • The study reveals that punishments for narcotics crimes often ignore rehabilitation options, leading to wrongful sentencing.
  • Findings indicate that the judge's decision conflicted with Article 103 of Narcotics Law, showing legal inconsistencies.
  • The analysis utilized normative research methods, focusing on library materials and secondary legal sources to gather insights.
  • Careful examination of legal principles shows that enhanced focus on rehabilitation may improve outcomes for offenders.

Cite This Study

Yarioni Grace Telaumbanua (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68efa18f9d05deea71d13f5bhttps://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v4i2.1669
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1PENERAPAN PEMIDANAAN KEPADA PELAKU YANG DENGAN SENGAJA TIDAK MELAPORKAN ADANYA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA2025
  2. 2LEGAL ANALYSIS OF JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN IMPOSING LIGHT CRIMINAL SANCTIONS ON DRUGS USERS (Analysis of Supreme Court Decision Number 758 K/Pid.Sus/2020)2025
  3. 3LEGAL ANALYSIS OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR DRUG ADDICTS (Study of Kisaran District Court Decision Number 296/Pid.Sus/2021/PN. Kis)2025
  4. 4Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Pengulangan (Residive) Tindak Pidana Peredaran Narkotika dalam Perspektif Hukum Penitensier2025
  5. 5Juridical Analysis of the Judge'S Decision in the Narcotics Courier Case (Study of Decision Number 28/Pid. Sus/2025/Pn Sng)2025