Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 10, 2025Journal of Law Politic and Humanities

Juridical Analysis of the Judge'S Decision in the Narcotics Courier Case (Study of Decision Number 28/Pid. Sus/2025/Pn Sng)

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AMAjeng Safitri MudriyaniDSDewi SartikaJambi UniversityMAMuhamad AbasMercu Buana University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Normative juridical study explores judges' considerations in narcotics cases, suggesting improvements in legal frameworks.

Key Points

  • Judges consider various factors, including the role of fraudsters and the amount of evidence in narcotics cases.
  • The study refers to Decision Number 28/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Sng, highlighting judicial assessment nuances.
  • A normative juridical approach analyzes laws and regulations related to narcotics as applied in judicial practice.
  • Despite strict legal frameworks, judges have discretion to assess couriers' roles proportionately in drug-related offenses.

Cite This Study

Mudriyani et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c23ed7b210217d6479453ehttps://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i5.2004
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1LEGAL ANALYSIS OF JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN IMPOSING LIGHT CRIMINAL SANCTIONS ON DRUGS USERS (Analysis of Supreme Court Decision Number 758 K/Pid.Sus/2020)2025
  2. 2ANALISIS YURIDIS PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA GOLONGAN I BUKAN TANAMAN2025
  3. 3LEGAL ANALYSIS OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR DRUG ADDICTS (Study of Kisaran District Court Decision Number 296/Pid.Sus/2021/PN. Kis)2025
  4. 4PENERAPAN PEMIDANAAN KEPADA PELAKU YANG DENGAN SENGAJA TIDAK MELAPORKAN ADANYA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA2025
  5. 5Juridical Analysis of the Evidentiary Practice in Criminal Conspiracy in Narcotics Cases2025