Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 12, 2025

Judicial Review and Constitutional Court Authority: Comparative Analysis of Indonesia's Constitutional Court and International Best Practices

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SSSaharuddin SaharuddinUniversity of Pattimura

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Comparative legal analysis explores judicial review authority in Indonesia, suggesting improvements based on international practices.

Key Points

  • Indonesia's Constitutional Court has comprehensive authority yet faces challenges in enforcement and backlog management.
  • The study analyzes judicial review systems in Germany, South Korea, South Africa, and the United States as governance models.
  • Adopting international best practices can strengthen Indonesia's constitutional court, enhancing efficiency and safeguards.
  • Clear jurisdictional boundaries and robust enforcement are key to effective judicial review, as demonstrated by other countries.

Cite This Study

Saharuddin Saharuddin (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68ebffcfdef9fcb308ff25b9https://doi.org/10.62383/iclehr.v2i1.48
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Reform of the Judicial Review System: Evaluation of the Constitutional Court's Authority in Maintaining Constitutional Supremacy2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2REASSESSING ABSOLUTE JURISDICTION: LEGAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND INSTITUTIONAL IMMUNITY OF INDONESIA’S CONSTITUTIONAL COURT2025
  3. 3Reforming Ethical Oversight Mechanisms for Constitutional Court Justices in Indonesia2025
  4. 4Judicial Overreach and the Rise of the Positive Legislator: A Constitutional Analysis of Indonesia’s Constitutional Court2025
  5. 5Reformulation Design of the Constitutional Judge Code of Ethics Council: A Comparative Study for Strengthening the Constitutional Court2025