Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 12, 2025Open Access

Reform of the Judicial Review System: Evaluation of the Constitutional Court's Authority in Maintaining Constitutional Supremacy

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

HHHarlina HamidNNNurasia NatsirInstitut Ilmu Kesehatan Bhakti Wiyata

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

This analysis assesses judicial review impacts in Indonesia, revealing gaps in constitutional authority and suggesting reforms.

Key Points

  • The evaluation reveals structural weaknesses in the judicial review mechanism and its enforcement.
  • Analysis of rulings from 2019 to 2024 shows dualism in judicial authority limiting effectiveness.
  • Normative and empirical legal research methods were utilized to assess the Constitutional Court's impact.
  • Comprehensive reforms are necessary to enhance legal certainty and strengthen the Court's constitutional role.

Cite This Study

Hamid et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68ebffcfdef9fcb308ff25adhttps://doi.org/10.62383/iclehr.v2i1.58
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Judicial Review and Constitutional Court Authority: Comparative Analysis of Indonesia's Constitutional Court and International Best Practices2025
  2. 2Judicial Overreach and the Rise of the Positive Legislator: A Constitutional Analysis of Indonesia’s Constitutional Court2025
  3. 3Reforming Ethical Oversight Mechanisms for Constitutional Court Justices in Indonesia2025
  4. 4The Judicial Commission and Institutional Challenges in the Appointment of Judges in Indonesia’s Reform Framework2025
  5. 5Urgensi Penataan Ulang Mekanisme Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia2025