October 3, 2025Hipotenusa Journal of Mathematical SocietyOpen Access

Newman Error Analysis (NEA): Identifying Students' Functional Thinking Errors Based on Self-Efficacy

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

SYSuci YuniatiUniversitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau RNRizky Aulia Nisa AKAnnisah Kurniati

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Qualitative study reveals a link between self-efficacy and functional thinking errors in high school students, suggesting targeted strategies for improvement.

Key Points

Students with high and medium self-efficacy made fewer functional thinking errors.
Comprehension errors, transformation errors, process skill errors, and encoding errors were prevalent among students with low self-efficacy.
Qualitative analysis used purposive sampling to explore functional thinking errors and self-efficacy levels.
Findings emphasize the need for targeted instructional strategies to enhance students' understanding of functional concepts.

Cite This Study

Yuniati et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e040eda99c246f578b359f https://doi.org/10.18326/hipotenusa.v7i1.2092

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Qualitative study reveals a link between self-efficacy and functional thinking errors in high school students, suggesting targeted strategies for improvement.

Newman Error Analysis (NEA): Identifying Students' Functional Thinking Errors Based on Self-Efficacy

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Newman Error Analysis (NEA): Identifying Students' Functional Thinking Errors Based on Self-Efficacy

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider