Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 1, 2025

Bridging Disciplines, Empowering Students: A Scoping Review Protocol for K–12 Sexual Health Education (Preprint)

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MEMaria Dolors EstradaEAEmily AhnerEEEileen Enriquez

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

This scoping review analyzes interdisciplinary collaboration in sexual health education for K-12 students, suggesting policy improvements.

Key Points

  • The review identifies gaps in sexual health education curricula across the U.S., highlighting the need for comprehensive programs.
  • Examining existing research on K-12 sexual health education, it aims to recommend actionable strategies for educators and policymakers.
  • The methodology includes reviewing studies published in English, focusing on interdisciplinary aspects of sexual health education.
  • The findings will support the development of equitable and effective sexual health education, ultimately improving adolescent well-being.

Cite This Study

Estrada et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dd9537fe798ba2fc4997e2https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.85041
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1National and international guidelines for young adults’ sexual health education: a scoping review protocol2025
  2. 2Health of Black Populations and Sexual and Gender Minorities in Health Education: A Scoping Review2026
  3. 3Lay health worker-delivered and technology-based interventions for sexual and reproductive health among adolescents and young adults in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a scoping review.2025 · 2 citations
  4. 4Exploring effective strategies for health education in schools: a systematic review2025
  5. 5School nurse-involved sexual and reproductive health education for adolescents’ students in high-income countries: a mixed-methods systematic review2025