Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 20, 2025

Evaluating the Potential and Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and 4.0 in Medical Licensing and In-Training Examinations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Preprint)

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AJAnila JaleelUAUmair AzizGFGhulam Farid

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Systematic review demonstrates ChatGPT-4's superior accuracy in medical licensing exams, highlighting implications for education.

Key Points

  • ChatGPT-4 outperformed ChatGPT-3.5 in medical licensing exams, achieving an accuracy of 81.8% compared to 60.8%.
  • A pooled risk ratio of 1.36 indicates that ChatGPT-4 is 36% more likely to provide correct answers than ChatGPT-3.5.
  • The systematic review included 53 studies focusing on accuracy rates of ChatGPT-3.5 and 4.0 across various exams.
  • ChatGPT-4's performance advantage varies by exam type, emphasizing the need for targeted improvements in AI training.

Cite This Study

Jaleel et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d441ad713b0b5dfea8105ehttps://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.68070
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluating the Potential and Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and 4.0 in Medical Licensing and In-Training Examinations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2025 · 20 citations
  2. 2A multi-model longitudinal assessment of ChatGPT performance on medical residency examinations2025 · 5 citations
  3. 3Evaluating ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 in Oral Medicine and Radiology: A Comparative Query-Based Cross-sectional Study2025 · 4 citations
  4. 4The performance of ChatGPT on medical image-based assessments and implications for medical education2025 · 12 citations
  5. 5ChatGPT’s progress over time: A longitudinal enhancing biostatistical problem-solving in medical education2025 · 1 citations