Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 23, 2025Open Access

Enhancing Institutional Quality: An Assessment of Accreditation Readiness and Stakeholder Experiences

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MMMary Rose MontanoRGRonald A. GonzalesSASimplicio P. Alba

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Mixed-methods analysis reveals high accreditation readiness and stakeholder satisfaction, highlighting challenges faced.

Key Points

  • Accreditation readiness was rated high at 4.23, indicating effective institutional quality assurance efforts.
  • Stakeholder satisfaction scored 4.30, with administrators showing the most favorable perceptions of the accreditation process.
  • Qualitative insights from thematic analysis revealed key challenges including resource limitations and administrative support issues.
  • Strong positive correlation (r = .894) between accreditation readiness and stakeholder satisfaction suggests shared institutional experiences.

Cite This Study

Montano et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d440a6713b0b5dfea7fecahttps://doi.org/10.31098/bmss.v5i1.922
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Quality in Higher Education Institutions as a Transversal Tool in Institutional Accreditation: A Bibliometric Review2025 · 3 citations
  2. 2Evaluation of the Quality Assurance Practices of the College of Education Programs of a Philippine Local University2025
  3. 3Accreditation as a Marker of Institutional Reliability: An Analysis of National and International Accreditation Perceptions2025
  4. 4Quality Assurance in Health Care Improving Patient Safety of Service Quality2025
  5. 5Practice and Policy Implications of Quality Assurance and Accreditation: A Review2025 · 2 citations