Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 23, 2025NeurodiversityOpen Access

Underrepresentation of Females and Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups in Research on Pragmatic Language in Autism: A Scoping Review

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

GMGary E. MartinSESarah B. EthridgeMBMaureen Butler

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Scoping review highlights underrepresentation of females and racial minority groups in autism studies, suggesting bias in research practices.

Key Points

  • Less than 10% of studies on pragmatic language in autism reported race and ethnicity data, indicating a serious gap.
  • Around 80% of reviewed studies included reports on sex while 70% documented language spoken, showing some level of engagement.
  • Empirical analysis evaluated over 1,800 studies, resulting in 308 that met inclusion criteria for this critical review.
  • Findings emphasize the need for inclusive research to improve autism diagnosis and interventions among diverse populations.

Cite This Study

Martin et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d43ed7713b0b5dfea7e66ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/27546330251381443
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Expanding the autism evidence base: Strategies to increase participant representation2025
  2. 2Exploring the Development of Pragmatic Assessments in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Literature Review2025
  3. 3Diagnostic challenges of autism spectrum disorder in women without intellectual or language impairments: a narrative review.2025 · 5 citations
  4. 4Pragmatics in children with autism spectrum disorder2025
  5. 5<b>Comparison of Pre-Linguistic Skills Among Male and Female Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder</b>2025