Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 10, 2025Majalah Kesehatan IndonesiaOpen Access

Analysis of Commercial Enteral Formula (CEF) and Hospital Enteral Formula (HEF) usage on cost budget and patient food acceptance

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

TPTri Putri PutriMMMitra MitraLDLiza Srikusuma Devi

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analysis shows hospital enteral formulas improve cost efficiency and maintain patient acceptance.

Key Points

  • HEF is 51.64% - 52.64% more cost-efficient than CEF, serving as a viable alternative for hospitals.
  • Patient acceptance of HEF is high, with positive feedback particularly on taste and texture.
  • Observational analysis of patient interviews and kitchen staff revealed significant insights into food procurement.
  • Using HEF may optimize hospital budgets while ensuring patient nutritional needs are met effectively.

Cite This Study

Putri et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c2409bb210217d6479b586https://doi.org/10.47679/makein.2025221
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1From Ancient Enemas to Tube Feeding, II: Clinical Outcomes and Future Directions Surrounding Commercial Versus Food-Based Formulas in Critical Illness2025
  2. 2Evaluation of food safety in the handling of home enteral nutrition based on a new contamination risk classification: A cross‐sectional study2025
  3. 3A multi-center, prospective, single-arm, open label, 13-month intervention study of a plant-based, high energy and protein enteral tube feed in home enterally tube fed patients2025
  4. 4Experience of Healthcare Providers on Enteral Nutrition: Challenges and Ways to Improve Current Practice2025
  5. 5Comparison of enteral nutritional therapy to induce and maintain remission in paediatric patients with mild-to-moderate Crohn’s disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis in the UK2025