Meta-analysis reveals positive effects of reading strategy instruction on comprehension and usage in English L2 learners, indicating variables like learner factors influence effectiveness.
Previous meta-analyses of reading strategy (RS) instruction in second and foreign language (L2) contexts have consistently shown that RS instruction has a positive impact on reading comprehension. However, whether RS instruction can promote both the use of RS and reading comprehension among English L2 learners is unclear. The effect of some moderators, such as learner and environmental factors, on the effectiveness of RS instruction among English L2 learners also remains unclear. To examine these aspects of RS instruction, our meta-analysis aimed to explore (a) the extent to which RS instruction is effective in improving not only reading comprehension but also the frequency of RS use in English L2 learners and (b) how this effectiveness varies by learner factors and learning environment. Through a rigorous literature search, we identified 27 eligible articles on English RS instruction for inclusion in our meta-analysis. The effect sizes (Hedges’ g) obtained were analyzed, followed by a moderator analysis to examine how the effects of RS instruction varied according to different moderators, including learner factors (i.e., educational level and proficiency) and environmental factors (i.e., region and context). Based on our findings, we discuss the implications for future research and teaching practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ueno et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: