September 10, 2025Education SciencesOpen Access

Measuring Mathematics Teaching Quality: The State of the Field and a Call for the Future

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

MGMelissa A. Gallagher TFTimothy D. Folger TWTemple A. Walkowiak

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Systematic review identifies 47 instruments for measuring teaching quality in mathematics, suggesting improvements in validity and fairness evidence are needed.

Key Points

Forty-seven instruments measuring mathematics teaching quality were identified, focusing on enactments captured via observations or questionnaires.
The review highlights that instrument developers most frequently provide reliability evidence, but much less on fairness or response processes.
Only two instruments included a complete integrated interpretation and use argument framework, while eleven had partial components.
Improvements are essential for validity and fairness evidence, underscoring gaps in measuring mathematics teaching quality.

Cite This Study

Gallagher et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c23b8fb210217d64785e95 https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091158

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Systematic review identifies 47 instruments for measuring teaching quality in mathematics, suggesting improvements in validity and fairness evidence are needed.

Measuring Mathematics Teaching Quality: The State of the Field and a Call for the Future

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Measuring Mathematics Teaching Quality: The State of the Field and a Call for the Future

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider