June 30, 2024Justitia et PaxOpen Access

Asas Res Judicata Pro Veritate Habetur Dalam Peninjauan Kembali Terhadap Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Hukum Oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

NPNgurah Ketut Widhi Aditya PinatihUniversitas Gadjah Mada

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

This analysis explores the judicial review process in Indonesia under the principle of res judicata pro veritate habetur, suggesting mixed implications for acquitted individuals.

Key Points

Judicial review can challenge acquittals by the Public Prosecutor, impacting fairness in criminal justice.
Key legislative frameworks include the Criminal Procedure Code and the Judicial Power Act, framing judicial review practices.
Library research highlights controversial cases, such as those involving Djoko Tjandra and Hartono, showing practical applications.
Exceptions to the res judicata principle primarily apply to convicts or their heirs, emphasizing specific legal nuances.

Cite This Study

Ngurah Ketut Widhi Aditya Pinatih (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af7f4b7567bf4f94ff6992 https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v40i1.8219

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

This analysis explores the judicial review process in Indonesia under the principle of res judicata pro veritate habetur, suggesting mixed implications for acquitted individuals.

Asas Res Judicata Pro Veritate Habetur Dalam Peninjauan Kembali Terhadap Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Hukum Oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Asas Res Judicata Pro Veritate Habetur Dalam Peninjauan Kembali Terhadap Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Hukum Oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider