Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 10, 2025Ma’mal Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah dan Hukum

Implementation of the Principle of Res Judicata Pro Varitate Habetur in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

BRBarokatun Nuris Syah Riyah

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analysis of the application of res judicata in the 2023 Constitutional Court decision, highlighting potential authority excess.

Key Points

  • The study reveals that res judicata pro varitate habitur is not applicable if authority is exceeded by state institutions.
  • Key evidence shows that the Constitutional Court's Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 is deemed flawed due to a breach of ethics and legislative overreach.
  • Normative legal research employed legislative, conceptual, and case studies to gather data from laws and prior rulings.
  • The findings stress the need for clear legislation to address exceptions to res judicata and ensure legal balance.

Cite This Study

Barokatun Nuris Syah Riyah (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c23f63b210217d64796fd9https://doi.org/10.15642/mal.v7i1.442
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share