Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 7, 2025

Trapping Witnesses Who Give False Testimony Study of the Criminal Code and Qanun Law

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

KKKaswandi KaswandiHHHayun HayunMMMuh Sutri Mansyah

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Normative analysis highlights challenges in prosecuting false testimony under the Indonesian Criminal Code and Aceh Qanun.

Key Points

  • The research reveals significant challenges in prosecuting witnesses who provide false testimony under Indonesian law.
  • Key statutes like Articles 291 and 373 aim to ensure truthful witness testimony, yet they lack clear guidelines for enforcement.
  • The normative method used incorporates legislative and historical analyses, offering insights into current legal challenges.
  • A need for future legislation is emphasized to clarify standards for determining false testimony and its prosecution.

Cite This Study

Kaswandi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af296ecf1dd9ea359e2ba2https://doi.org/10.64317/alqadha.v1i1.4
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Witness Trapping in False Testimony Cases2025
  2. 2Juridical Review of Witness Evidence in Criminal Case Trials Who Refuse to Take an Oath2025
  3. 3The Position of The Defendant’s Statement as Evidence in The Perpective of Islamic Criminal Justice2025
  4. 4False testimony in criminal law: between the protection of public interest and the safeguard of individual rights2025
  5. 5Revisiting The Interpretation of The Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code: Legal Basis for Witnessteleconferencing2025