Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 7, 2025

Witness Trapping in False Testimony Cases

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

FMFatimah MaisarahLALa Ode Bunga Ali

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

This analysis reveals gaps in regulations on false testimony in Indonesian law and Qanun Jinayat, highlighting preventive measures.

Key Points

  • Witness trapping undermines judicial integrity, leading to potential miscarriages of justice and eroding public trust.
  • Enforcement gaps in Indonesia's Criminal Code continue to allow false testimony to flourish, requiring reinforced legal protections.
  • The research utilizes comparative legal analysis, examining both Indonesia's Criminal Code and Qanun Jinayat's frameworks for handling false testimony.
  • Integrating religious and ethical education may enhance deterrence against witness trapping, promoting moral accountability alongside legal sanctions.

Cite This Study

Maisarah et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af296ecf1dd9ea359e2b99https://doi.org/10.64317/alqadha.v1i1.5
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Trapping Witnesses Who Give False Testimony Study of the Criminal Code and Qanun Law2025
  2. 2False testimony in criminal law: between the protection of public interest and the safeguard of individual rights2025
  3. 3The Position of The Defendant’s Statement as Evidence in The Perpective of Islamic Criminal Justice2025
  4. 4Juridical Review of Witness Evidence in Criminal Case Trials Who Refuse to Take an Oath2025
  5. 5Psychosocial determinants of false testimonies: The role of social pressure and cognitive vulnerability2025