Observational analysis shows cilostazol mitigates nephrotoxicity in rats, highlighting its potential as a protective agent.
This study aimed to evaluate the nephroprotective effect of Cilostazol on Cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Female Wistar albino rats were divided into four groups: normal, Cis (8 mg/kg), and two Cilostazol treatment groups (30 and 60 mg/kg) with cisplatin. Cisplatin application significantly deteriorated renal function- manifested by increased serum creatinine (261%) and BUN (134%)-and enhanced oxidative stress-characterized by increased MDA (234%) and decreased GSH (64%). Cisplatin also affected autophagy markers, which included a 62% decrease in P62 and a doubling of LC3II. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway was significantly downregulated with reductions in PI3K (72%), mTOR (73%), and p-AKT/AKT ratio. NF-κB p65 was also increased by 1.5-fold. Moreover, an observed pronounced increase in the expression of TNF-α, caspase-3, and beclin-1 of the cisplatin-intoxicated rats. At the same time, Cilostazol (30 or 60 mg/kg) significantly reversed these changes, with a dose-dependent nephroprotective effect. At a higher dose (60 mg/kg), most parameters were comparable to the normal group, demonstrating superiority over the 30 mg/kg dose. These findings underpin that cilostazol modulates oxidative stress, inflammation, and autophagy pathways mainly via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling axis to exert its renoprotective effect. Thus, cilostazol provides a promising potential in preventing cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. This outcome paves the way for the possible co-administration of cilostazol in the clinical realm to spare the deleterious effects of cisplatin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
El‐Marasy et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: