PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
This research is Trending!
August 31, 2026New England Journal of Medicine1 citations

Timing of PCI in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation

View Full Paper
BSBarbara E. StähliFRFrank RuschitzkaDWDirk Westermann

Key Result

TAVI before PCI was noninferior to PCI before TAVI for the primary composite endpoint at 1 year (22.2% vs 24.2%; risk difference -2.0 percentage points; P<0.001 for noninferiority).

Key Points

  • To evaluate whether performing transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is noninferior to performing PCI before TAVI in patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease.
  • International, open-label, randomized noninferiority trial conducted across 48 centers in Europe (N=986; NCT04310046).
  • Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either TAVI before PCI (TAVI-first group, n=498) or PCI before TAVI (PCI-first group, n=488).
  • The primary end point was a 1-year composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, rehospitalization related to the valve, procedure, or heart failure, or major/disabling/life-threatening bleeding (noninferiority margin: 6.6 percentage points).
  • A primary end-point event occurred in 105 patients (22.2%) in the TAVI-first group and 112 patients (24.2%) in the PCI-first group (risk difference, −2.0 percentage points; 95% CI, −7.4 to 3.4; P<0.001 for noninferiority).
  • Serious adverse events were reported in 264 patients in the TAVI-first group and in 273 patients in the PCI-first group.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=986)

Blinding

Open-label

Randomization

1:1

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does a strategy of TAVI before PCI reduce adverse clinical events in patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease compared to PCI before TAVI?

P
Population
986 patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease followed for 1 year.
I
Intervention
Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) performed before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (TAVI-first strategy)
C
Comparator
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed before TAVI (PCI-first strategy)
O
Outcome
Composite of death from any cause; nonfatal myocardial infarction; ischemia-driven revascularization; rehospitalization related to the valve, procedure, or heart failure; or life-threatening, disabling, or major bleeding at 1 year after randomizationcomposite

In patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease, a strategy of performing TAVI before PCI is noninferior to PCI before TAVI regarding a 1-year composite clinical endpoint.

Main Result

Effect estimate: risk difference -2.0 percentage points (95% CI -7.4 to 3.4)

Absolute Event Rate: 22.2% vs 24.2%

Absolute Risk Reduction: 2%

p-value: p=<0.001 for noninferiority

Abstract

BackgroundApproximately one half of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) have concomitant coronary artery disease. Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is often performed before TAVI, the preferred treatment strategy has not been established. MethodsWe conducted an international, open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial at 48 centers in Europe. Patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a strategy of either TAVI before PCI (TAVI-first group) or PCI before TAVI (PCI-first group). The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause; nonfatal myocardial infarction; ischemia-driven revascularization; rehospitalization related to the valve, procedure, or heart failure; or life-threatening, disabling, or major bleeding at 1 year after randomization. The noninferiority margin was 6.6 percentage points, with testing for noninferiority of TAVI first as compared with PCI first. ResultsA total of 986 patients underwent randomization: 498 were assigned to the TAVI-first group and 488 to the PCI-first group. A primary end-point event occurred in 105 patients (22.2%) in the TAVI-first group and in 112 patients (24.2%) in the PCI-first group (risk difference, −2.0 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, −7.4 to 3.4; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Serious adverse events occurred in 264 patients in the TAVI-first group and in 273 patients in the PCI-first group. ConclusionsAmong patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease, a strategy of TAVI before PCI was noninferior to a strategy of PCI before TAVI with respect to the primary end point at 1 year. (Funded by University Hospital Zurich and others; TAVI PCI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04310046.)

Expert Takes13 quotes

1/13

“Importantly, this was not because coronary access was impaired after TAVI. Rather, once the valve had been treated, the clinical decision about whether PCI was still necessary sometimes changed.”

ACC Journal ScanView source
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper
Trending Research#2 this week

ESC 2026 Hot Line; simultaneous NEJM pub; ACC news coverage; debates on optimal sequencing in structural heart Twitter threads.

Social attention
85
Preprint velocity
0
News coverage
80
Conference
95
Expert commentary
85

Cite This Study

Stähli et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease (n=986). TAVI before PCI (TAVI-first) vs. PCI before TAVI (PCI-first) was evaluated on Composite of death from any cause; nonfatal myocardial infarction; ischemia-driven revascularization; rehospitalization related to the valve, procedure, or heart failure; or life-threatening, disabling, or major bleeding at 1 year (risk difference -2.0 percentage points, 95% CI -7.4 to 3.4, p=<0.001 for noninferiority). TAVI before PCI was noninferior to PCI before TAVI for the primary composite endpoint at 1 year (22.2% vs 24.2%; risk difference -2.0 percentage points; P<0.001 for noninferiority).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8fbb6517152b56e6b6482ehttps://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2606924
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A randomized comparison of the treatment sequence of percutaneous coronary intervention and transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Rationale and design of the TAVI PCI trial2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2Coronary Artery Disease and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement2019 · 303 citations
  3. 3Impact of Coronary Artery Revascularization Completeness on Outcomes of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement2018 · 69 citations
  4. 4The Prognostic Effects of Coronary Disease Severity and Completeness of Revascularization on Mortality in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement2017 · 126 citations
  5. 5Coronary Catheterization and Percutaneous Interventions After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation2016 · 75 citations