PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 9, 2014New England Journal of Medicine2,786 citationsOpen Access

Spironolactone for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

View Full Paper
BPBertram PittMPMarc A. PfefferSASusan F. Assmann

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists improve the prognosis for patients with heart failure and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. We evaluated the effects of spironolactone in patients with heart failure and a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned 3445 patients with symptomatic heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 45% or more to receive either spironolactone (15 to 45 mg daily) or placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, aborted cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for the management of heart failure. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 3.3 years, the primary outcome occurred in 320 of 1722 patients in the spironolactone group (18.6%) and 351 of 1723 patients in the placebo group (20.4%) (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.77 to 1.04; P=0.14). Of the components of the primary outcome, only hospitalization for heart failure had a significantly lower incidence in the spironolactone group than in the placebo group (206 patients 12.0% vs. 245 patients 14.2%; hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.99, P=0.04). Neither total deaths nor hospitalizations for any reason were significantly reduced by spironolactone. Treatment with spironolactone was associated with increased serum creatinine levels and a doubling of the rate of hyperkalemia (18.7%, vs. 9.1% in the placebo group) but reduced hypokalemia. With frequent monitoring, there were no significant differences in the incidence of serious adverse events, a serum creatinine level of 3.0 mg per deciliter (265 μmol per liter) or higher, or dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction, treatment with spironolactone did not significantly reduce the incidence of the primary composite outcome of death from cardiovascular causes, aborted cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for the management of heart failure. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; TOPCAT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00094302.).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pitt et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a80c0145423816b8118ed19https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1313731
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Baseline Characteristics of Patients in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial2012 · 181 citations
  2. 2Rationale and design of the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial: A randomized, controlled study of spironolactone in patients with symptomatic heart failure and preserved ejection fraction2011 · 275 citations
  3. 3Geographic variability in patient characteristics, treatment and outcome in an international trial of magnesium in acute myocardial infarction2004 · 21 citations
  4. 4The Effect of Spironolactone on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Severe Heart Failure2000 · 2,936 citations
  5. 5Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials2000 · 1,186 citations