Why the study?
Does a guideline-based nursing intervention improve device acceptance and self-efficacy in patients receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator?
Population
60 implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) candidates
Comparison
Guideline-based nursing care during the pre- and… vs Routine care (sequential control group)
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
30 days
Key result
An evidence-based nursing intervention significantly improved device acceptance (mean FPAS score 93.26 vs 60.53) and self-efficacy at 30 days post-implantation compared to routine care.
Authors
Loading...
May support nursing interventions for ICD acceptance; leaves open causal effects and durability pending RCTs.
Does a guideline-based nursing intervention improve device acceptance and self-efficacy in patients receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator?
Absolute Event Rate: 93.26% vs 60.53%
p-value: p=<0.001
A guideline-based nursing intervention significantly improves device acceptance, self-efficacy, and satisfaction while reducing distress in patients receiving an ICD.
Kılıçlı et al. (2026) studied First-time implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation (n=60). Evidence-based nursing intervention guided by a nursing guideline vs. Routine care was evaluated on Device acceptance (FPAS total score) at 30 days (p=<0.001). An evidence-based nursing intervention significantly improved device acceptance (mean FPAS score 93.26 vs 60.53) and self-efficacy at 30 days post-implantation compared to routine care.