Key result
Aficamten improves KCCQ scores by 3 points and peak VO2 vs placebo at 36 weeks.
Why the study?
Does aficamten improve exercise capacity and patient-reported health status in adults with symptomatic nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Population
517 adults with symptomatic nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, mean age 55.1 years, 53.6% women…
Comparison
Aficamten for up to 72 weeks. vs Placebo for up to 72 weeks.
Design
RCT, 1:1 ratio, double-blind
Follow-up
36 weeks
Authors
Loading...
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
What they’re arguing about
supportiveneutralcautiouscritical
Counts are expert takes we classified by axis. Tap a row to see the takes behind its count.
“Based on this trial, this is the first-ever successful therapy for nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. These results are highly encouraging for patients with this condition and for cardiologists who struggle to help them.”
“Results from the ACACIA-HCM trial provide really positive news for patients with symptomatic non-obstructive HCM. For the first time, we have shown clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms and exercise capacity with a treatment that targets the cause of the disease.”
“What I can say is that this is a positive clinical trial, and you have multiple domains of benefit. Every way, shape, or form you look at this, there was benefit that was derived from aficamten in a disease that has no treatments available right now.”
Provides first targeted option for symptomatic nonobstructive HCM; extends myosin inhibition beyond obstructive disease.
RCT (n=517)
Double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does aficamten improve exercise capacity and patient-reported health status in adults with symptomatic nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Mean Difference: 3 (95% CI 0.5–5.5)
Absolute Event Rate: 11.4% vs 8.4%
p-value: p=0.02
In patients with symptomatic nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, aficamten significantly improved exercise capacity and patient-reported health status at 36 weeks compared to placebo.
Journal, society, and media accounts. Useful signal, not independent expert judgment.
Masri et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Symptomatic nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=517). Aficamten vs. Placebo was evaluated on Change from baseline to week 36 in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score (KCCQ-CSS) (MD 3.0, 95% CI 0.5 to 5.5, p=0.02). Aficamten significantly improved KCCQ-CSS (MD 3.0; 95% CI 0.5-5.5; P=0.02) and peak oxygen uptake (MD 0.67 ml/kg/min; P=0.003) compared to placebo at 36 weeks in nonobstructive HCM.