Why the study?
Does lower Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) during Vitamin K Antagonist treatment increase the risk of ischemic stroke, bleeding, and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation and mechanical aortic valve replacement?
Population
1,086 patients with atrial fibrillation and mechanical aortic valve replacement, median age 62.8, 27.1%…
Comparison
Vitamin K Antagonist treatment with lower Time… vs Higher Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR)
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
10 years
Key result
Lower mean Time in Therapeutic Range was associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke (HR 1.23; 95% CI 1.03-1.49; p=0.030) in patients with atrial fibrillation and mechanical AVR.
Authors
Loading...
Suboptimal TTR identifies high-risk patients for bleeding, stroke, and death after mechanical AVR with AF; leaves open whether TTR optimization reduces events.
Cohort (n=1,086)
Yes
Does lower Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) during Vitamin K Antagonist treatment increase the risk of ischemic stroke, bleeding, and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation and mechanical aortic valve replacement?
Hazard Ratio: 1.23 (95% CI 1.03–1.49)
p-value: p=0.030
In patients with atrial fibrillation and mechanical aortic valve replacement, suboptimal time in therapeutic range on vitamin K antagonists is associated with increased risks of ischemic stroke, bleeding, and mortality.
Lehto et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation and mechanical aortic valve replacement (n=1,086). Lower mean Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) vs. Higher mean TTR was evaluated on First-ever ischemic stroke (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.03-1.49, p=0.030). Lower mean Time in Therapeutic Range was associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke (HR 1.23; 95% CI 1.03-1.49; p=0.030) in patients with atrial fibrillation and mechanical AVR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: