Why the study?
Does a nomogram incorporating LA stiffness and clinical factors improve stroke risk estimation compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc score in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Population
402 consecutive patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF)
Comparison
Nomogram incorporating echocardiographic left… vs CHA2DS2-VASc model
Design
Cross-sectional, Patients were randomly assigned to training and validation…
Key result
A nomogram incorporating left atrial stiffness and clinical factors showed excellent discrimination for stroke risk in NVAF patients, with a C-statistic of 0.880 (95% CI 0.808-0.932) in validation.
Authors
Loading...
May refine NVAF stroke risk estimates with LA stiffness; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Cross-Sectional (n=402)
No
Does a nomogram incorporating LA stiffness and clinical factors improve stroke risk estimation compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc score in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: C-statistic 0.880 (95% CI 0.808-0.932)
A novel nomogram incorporating echocardiographic left atrial stiffness and clinical factors provides superior stroke risk estimation in NVAF patients compared to the standard CHA2DS2-VASc score.
Zeng et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (n=402). Nomogram incorporating LA stiffness and clinical parameters vs. CHA2DS2-VASc model was evaluated on Stroke risk discrimination (C-statistic 0.880, 95% CI 0.808-0.932). A nomogram incorporating left atrial stiffness and clinical factors showed excellent discrimination for stroke risk in NVAF patients, with a C-statistic of 0.880 (95% CI 0.808-0.932) in validation.