Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 12, 2026BMC Medical ImagingOpen Access

Compressed-sensing accelerated cine imaging shows no difference from standard segmented cine for evaluating LVEF.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does compressed-sensing cardiac accelerated cine MR provide consistent left ventricular characteristics compared to standard segmented cine sequences?

Population

Participants from 35 studies who underwent both compressed-sensing accelerated cine and standard segmented…

Comparison

Compressed-sensing accelerated cine cardiac… vs Standard segmented cine sequences utilizing a…

Design

Meta-analysis

Key result

Compressed-sensing accelerated cine imaging did not differ from standard segmented cine imaging for evaluating left ventricular ejection fraction (SMD -0.05; 95% CI -0.11, 0.01; p=0.12).

Authors

ZWZhaozhao WangHKHuihui KongZZZekun Zhou

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

CS-cine matches Std-cine for LV quantification; confirms accelerated sequences as reliable alternatives in clinical CMR.

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate the consistency of left ventricular characteristics from compressed-sensing accelerated versus standard cine imaging sequences.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 35 studies
  • Compared LV parameters including ejection fraction, volume, and mass from both imaging techniques
  • Performed subgroup analyses based on arrhythmia presence, MRI field intensity, and breath control
  • CS-cine imaging did not differ significantly from Std-cine imaging in LV ejection fraction (SMD: -0.05; p=0.12)
  • Overall image quality was comparable, with CS-cine slightly better for those with arrhythmias (SMD: -0.36; p<0.05)
  • No significant differences in other LV parameters regardless of subgroup characteristics (I2=0.0%)

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis

Structured PICO

Does compressed-sensing cardiac accelerated cine MR provide consistent left ventricular characteristics compared to standard segmented cine sequences?

P
Population
Systematic review and meta-analysis of 35 studies comparing compressed-sensing accelerated cine versus standard segmented cine sequences for evaluating left ventricular characteristics.
I
Intervention
Compressed-sensing (CS) accelerated cine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) utilizing a balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) readout
C
Comparator
Standard segmented cine (Std-cine) sequences utilizing a bSSFP readout
O
Outcome
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), volume, mass, and image qualitysurrogate

Main Result

Standardized Mean Difference: -0.05 (95% CI -0.11–0.01)

p-value: p=0.12

Compressed-sensing accelerated cine MR provides accurate left ventricular functional parameters comparable to standard cine, with acceptable image quality that is superior for patients with arrhythmias.

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Left ventricular function evaluation. Compressed-sensing (CS) accelerated cine CMR vs. Standard segmented cine (Std-cine) sequences was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (SMD -0.05, 95% CI -0.11, 0.01, p=0.12). Compressed-sensing accelerated cine imaging did not differ from standard segmented cine imaging for evaluating left ventricular ejection fraction (SMD -0.05; 95% CI -0.11, 0.01; p=0.12).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5333754f7abc118adee08chttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02522-w
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share