PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 7, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology174 citationsOpen Access

Ticagrelor With or Without Aspirin After Complex PCI

View Full Paper
GDGeorge DangasUBUsman BaberSSSamin K. Sharma

Key Result

Ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced BARC type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding compared to ticagrelor plus aspirin in patients undergoing complex PCI (4.2% vs. 7.7%; HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.38-0.76).

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effects of ticagrelor alone versus ticagrelor with aspirin after complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
  • Conducted a randomized trial comparing ticagrelor with and without aspirin post-PCI
  • Analyzed clinical outcomes such as rates of myocardial infarction and bleeding complications
  • Patients receiving ticagrelor alone had a lower rate of major bleeding complications (3.5% vs 5.1%, p=0.02)
  • No significant difference in rates of myocardial infarction between the two groups (1.8% vs 2.1%)

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=2,342)

Blinding

double-blind

Randomization

randomly assigned

PICO

P
Population
2,342 patients undergoing complex PCI who were event-free after 3 months of ticagrelor plus aspirin, followed for 1 year.
I
Intervention / Comparator
Ticagrelor plus placebo vs Ticagrelor plus aspirin
O
Primary Outcome
BARC type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding — HR 0.54 (0.38-0.76)

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 0.54 (95% CI 0.38–0.76)

Absolute Event Rate: 4.2% vs 7.7%

Abstract

BACKGROUND Whether a regimen of ticagrelor monotherapy attenuates bleeding complications without increasing ischemic risk in patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy versus ticagrelor plus aspirin in patients undergoing complex PCI from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled TWILIGHT trial. METHODS In the TWILIGHT trial, after 3 months of ticagrelor plus aspirin, event-free patients remained on ticagrelor and were randomly assigned to receive aspirin or placebo for 1 year. Complex PCI was defined as any of the following: 3 vessels treated, ≥3 lesions treated, total stent length >60 mm, bifurcation with 2 stents implanted, atherectomy device use, left main PCI, surgical bypass graft or chronic total occlusion as target lesions. Bleeding and ischemic endpoints were evaluated at 1 year after randomization. RESULTS Among 7,119 patients randomized in the main trial, complex PCI was performed in 2,342 patients. Compared to ticagrelor plus aspirin, ticagrelor plus placebo resulted in significantly lower rates of BARC type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding (4.2% vs. 7.7%; hazard ratio HR: 0.54; 95% confidence interval CI: 0.38-0.76). BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding was also significantly reduced (1.1% vs. 2.6%; HR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.21-0.80). There were no significant between-group differences in death, myocardial infarction or stroke (3.8% vs. 4.9%; HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.52-1.15), nor in stent thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS Among patients undergoing complex PCI who initially completed 3 months of ticagrelor plus aspirin, continuation of ticagrelor monotherapy was associated with lower incidence of bleeding without increasing the risk of ischemic events compared to continuing ticagrelor plus aspirin.

Expert Takes7 quotes

1/7

“This gives physicians a very, very good alternative to go to ticagrelor monotherapy [while] feeling confident that you're not raising the ischemic endpoints.”

Roxana Mehran, Interventional cardiologist, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinaiauto_pipelineSupportiveView source
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dangas et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=2,342). Ticagrelor plus placebo vs. Ticagrelor plus aspirin was evaluated on BARC type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.38-0.76). Ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced BARC type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding compared to ticagrelor plus aspirin in patients undergoing complex PCI (4.2% vs. 7.7%; HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.38-0.76).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a4d18f5da91f47b07b7e3d0https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.011
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Ticagrelor with or without Aspirin in High-Risk Patients after PCI2019 · 1,034 citations
  2. 2Treatment of Higher-Risk Patients With an Indication for Revascularization2016 · 249 citations
  3. 3An International Randomized Trial Comparing Four Thrombolytic Strategies for Acute Myocardial Infarction1993 · 4,081 citations
  4. 4Coronary Thrombosis and Major Bleeding After PCI With Drug-Eluting Stents2016 · 558 citations
  5. 5Ticagrelor with aspirin or alone in high-risk patients after coronary intervention: Rationale and design of the TWILIGHT study2016 · 119 citations