Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 5, 2026EP EuropaceOpen Access

PFA yields similar acute pulmonary vein isolation and chronic durability compared to cryoballoon ablation.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does pulsed-field ablation compared to cryoballoon ablation improve acute and chronic pulmonary vein isolation and lesion geometry in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?

Population

Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation

Comparison

Fluoroscopy-guided pulmonary vein isolation with… vs Fluoroscopy-guided pulmonary vein isolation with…

Design

RCT, 1:1

Key result

Pulsed-field ablation resulted in 0% acute residual pulmonary vein conduction versus 16% with cryoballoon ablation (P=0.11), and similar chronic durability at repeat ablation (15% vs 14%).

Authors

TKThomas KuefferSKSven KnechtEAE Ayadi

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Acute 3D-EAM shows complete PVI after PFA but residual conduction in 16% after CBA; leaves open durability and outcome impact.

Key Points

  • To compare the effectiveness of pulsed-field ablation and cryoballoon ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation.
  • Patients randomized 1:1 to receive PFA or CBA for pulmonary vein isolation.
  • High-density 3D electroanatomic mapping performed on initial 25 patients post-ablation.
  • Assessment of lesion geometry and durability evaluated during follow-up ablation procedures.
  • Acute post-ablation mapping showed 16% residual conduction in CBA vs. 0% in PFA (P=0.11).
  • PFA produced larger left-sided lesions with median area of 5.7 mm² compared to 4.4 mm² for CBA (P=0.026).
  • Durable pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 62% of veins after PFA and 63% after CBA (P=0.88).

Study Design

Type

RCT

Randomization

1:1

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does pulsed-field ablation compared to cryoballoon ablation improve acute and chronic pulmonary vein isolation and lesion geometry in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation, evaluated with acute post-ablation mapping (n=50) and at repeat ablation (n=48).
I
Intervention
Fluoroscopy-guided pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed-field ablation (PFA)
C
Comparator
Fluoroscopy-guided pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon ablation (CBA)
O
Outcome
Acute pulmonary vein isolation, lesion geometry (assessed via 3D-EAM), and lesion durability at clinically indicated repeat ablationsurrogate

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 16%

p-value: p=0.11

Pulsed-field ablation and cryoballoon ablation demonstrate similar chronic pulmonary vein isolation durability, although PFA creates broader acute left-sided lesions and carries a risk of unintentional posterior wall block in small atria.

Cite This Study

Kueffer et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) vs. Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) was evaluated on Residual pulmonary vein conduction in acute post-ablation mapping (p=0.11). Pulsed-field ablation resulted in 0% acute residual pulmonary vein conduction versus 16% with cryoballoon ablation (P=0.11), and similar chronic durability at repeat ablation (15% vs 14%).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a49f70df5d1d45b2880125ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euag167
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison of Two Different Pulsed Field Ablation Systems: The Dual Pulse System Study2025 · 3 citations
  2. 2Beyond the learning curve: How operator experience affects pulsed-field ablation outcomes2025 · 10 citations