Why the study?
Do demographic refinements or AF type improve stroke risk discrimination beyond the CHA2DS2 VASc score in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Population
1,908 patients with atrial fibrillation from the Auckland Regional Community Stroke Study
Comparison
Addition of demographic refinements and AF type… vs Standard CHA2DS2 VASc predictors and traditional…
Design
Case-control
Key result
Addition of AF type to standard CHA2DS2 VASc predictors modestly increased discrimination for ischaemic stroke or TIA (AUC 0.71 vs 0.68; ΔAUC +0.03; p=0.015).
Authors
Loading...
Demographic refinements to CHA2DS2-VASc add uncertain value in multi-ethnic AF; leaves open need for prospective validation before wider adoption.
Case-Control (n=1,908)
Do demographic refinements or AF type improve stroke risk discrimination beyond the CHA2DS2 VASc score in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: ΔAUC +0.03
Absolute Event Rate: 0.71% vs 0.68%
p-value: p=0.015
Demographic refinements such as ethnicity do not significantly improve stroke risk prediction beyond the CHA2DS2-VASc score in atrial fibrillation, but incorporating AF type may offer modest incremental discriminatory value.
Mahawish et al. (2026) conducted a case-control in Atrial fibrillation (n=1,908). Addition of AF type to standard CHA2DS2 VASc predictors vs. Standard CHA2DS2 VASc predictors was evaluated on Discrimination for ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (AUC) (ΔAUC +0.03, p=0.015). Addition of AF type to standard CHA2DS2 VASc predictors modestly increased discrimination for ischaemic stroke or TIA (AUC 0.71 vs 0.68; ΔAUC +0.03; p=0.015).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: