Why the study?
Does an AI model using a single 12-lead ECG predict long-term mortality comparably to the ESC-SCORE in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome?
Population
n=720 patients scheduled for invasive coronary angiography due to suspected chronic coronary syndrome, with…
Comparison
Deep learning artificial intelligence model… vs ESC-SCORE (weighed for a German population).
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
long-term
Key result
An AI model using a single 12-lead ECG predicted long-term mortality with an AUROC of 0.606 (vs 0.584 for ESC-SCORE) in primary prevention and 0.612 (vs 0.658) in secondary prevention.
Authors
Loading...
AI-ECG modestly outperforms ESC-SCORE for mortality in primary prevention but underperforms in secondary; extends ECG-AI risk tools while needing validation.
Cohort (n=720)
Does an AI model using a single 12-lead ECG predict long-term mortality comparably to the ESC-SCORE in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome?
Effect estimate: AUROC 0.606 vs 0.584 (primary prevention); 0.612 vs 0.658 (secondary prevention)
Wegener et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Suspected chronic coronary syndrome (n=720). AI model based on a single 12-lead ECG vs. ESC-SCORE was evaluated on Long-term mortality (AUROC 0.606 vs 0.584 (primary prevention); 0.612 vs 0.658 (secondary prevention)). An AI model using a single 12-lead ECG predicted long-term mortality with an AUROC of 0.606 (vs 0.584 for ESC-SCORE) in primary prevention and 0.612 (vs 0.658) in secondary prevention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: