Why the study?
Does an incident cancer diagnosis increase the risk of arterial thromboembolism in Medicare enrollees?
Population
279,719 pairs of Medicare enrollees, consisting of patients with a new primary diagnosis of breast, lung…
Comparison
Incident cancer diagnosis vs Medicare enrollees without cancer, individually…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
Followed through 2012 (6-month and 1-year outcomes reported)
Authors
Loading...
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“Compared to an age and sex matched control group they found a cumulative incidence of arterial thromboembolism of 4.7% in all cancer patients vs. 2.2% at 6 months. The risk is higher in some types of tumours such as lung, gastric, and pancreatic. Advance stage was associated with increased ATEs risk, with stage IV patients having a >10-fold increase in ATE in the first month after diagnosis of cancer.”
“Cancer is associated with a 2-fold risk of ATE including myocardial infarction and stroke. The risk of ATE is higher in older men and in patients with lung or kidney cancer.”
May inform anticoagulation decisions in high-risk cancer patients; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Does an incident cancer diagnosis increase the risk of arterial thromboembolism in Medicare enrollees?
Patients with incident cancer have a substantially increased short-term risk of arterial thromboembolism, including myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke, which correlates with cancer stage and generally resolves by 1 year.
Navi et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: