Why the study?
Does significant weight reduction combined with antiarrhythmic drugs reduce AF burden comparably to catheter ablation in patients with AF and BMI 30-40?
Population
182 patients with atrial fibrillation and BMI 30-40. Mean age 60, 31-32% women, 54-56% paroxysmal AF.
Comparison
Lifestyle modification combined with… vs Catheter ablation (CA)
Design
Cohort, Original trial was randomized; this is a per-protocol sub-analysis…
Follow-up
12 months
Key result
Significant weight reduction (>8.3%) combined with antiarrhythmic drugs resulted in a median AF burden at 12 months (0%) that did not differ significantly from catheter ablation (0%, p=0.17).
Authors
Loading...
AF burden remained higher with lifestyle modification plus drugs despite weight loss; leaves open optimal LFM dosing or combinations versus ablation.
RCT (n=182)
Does significant weight reduction combined with antiarrhythmic drugs reduce AF burden comparably to catheter ablation in patients with AF and BMI 30-40?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
p-value: p=0.17
In patients with AF and obesity, achieving a weight reduction of >8.3% combined with antiarrhythmic drugs results in an AF burden at 12 months comparable to that achieved with catheter ablation.
Herman et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation (AF) and BMI 30-40 (n=182). Lifestyle modification (weight reduction) + antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) vs. Catheter ablation (CA) was evaluated on AF burden at 12 months (p=0.17). Significant weight reduction (>8.3%) combined with antiarrhythmic drugs resulted in a median AF burden at 12 months (0%) that did not differ significantly from catheter ablation (0%, p=0.17).