Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 12, 2026Diabetes

Clinical and preclinical obesity in Latino youth were associated with higher BMI%, waist circumference, fat mass, and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue compared to no obesity (all p<0.05).

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Do total, regional, and ectopic adipose tissue fat content and diabetes risk factors differ across Lancet Commission obesity phenotypes in Latino youth with BMI ≥95th percentile?

Population

117 Latino youth (aged 12-16 years) with obesity (BMI ≥95th percentile)

Comparison

Clinical Obesity and Preclinical Obesity… vs No Obesity (NO) phenotype

Design

Cross-sectional

Key result

Clinical and preclinical obesity in Latino youth were associated with higher BMI%, waist circumference, fat mass, and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue compared to no obesity (all p<0.05).

Authors

MSMACY L. SHEPARDAPARMANDO PENA

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Refines obesity phenotyping in Latino youth; leaves open whether clinical obesity improves cardiometabolic risk prediction.

Key Points

  • The study aims to characterize cardiometabolic disease risk profiles in youth using new obesity definitions.
  • Enrolled 117 Latino youth aged 12-16 with obesity (BMI≥95th%) from the Preventing Diabetes in Latino Youth study.
  • Assessed fat content using DXA and MRI, defined obesity phenotypes based on body fat and metabolic risk factors.
  • Conducted one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni corrections for comparison of groups.
  • 40% of participants had Clinical Obesity (CO), 41% Preclinical Obesity (PO), and 19% No Obesity (NO).
  • CO and PO exhibited significantly higher body fat, waist circumference, HOMA-IR, and insulin AUC versus NO.
  • CO showed lower adiponectin and oral disposition index than NO, indicating greater insulin resistance.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=117)

Structured PICO

Do total, regional, and ectopic adipose tissue fat content and diabetes risk factors differ across Lancet Commission obesity phenotypes in Latino youth with BMI ≥95th percentile?

P
Population
117 Latino youth aged 12-16 years with obesity (BMI≥95th%) assessed at baseline for cardiometabolic disease risk profiles.
E
Exposure
Clinical Obesity (CO) and Preclinical Obesity (PO) phenotypes based on Lancet Commission definitions
C
Comparator
No Obesity (NO) phenotype
O
Outcome
Total, regional, and ectopic adipose tissue fat content and diabetes risk factors (insulin dynamics, glucose regulation, adiponectin)surrogate

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.05

The Lancet Commission obesity definitions effectively stratify cardiometabolic risk and adiposity profiles among Latino youth with BMI ≥95th percentile.

Cite This Study

SHEPARD et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Obesity (n=117). Clinical Obesity and Preclinical Obesity vs. No Obesity was evaluated on Total, regional, and ectopic adipose tissue fat content and diabetes risk factors (p=<0.05). Clinical and preclinical obesity in Latino youth were associated with higher BMI%, waist circumference, fat mass, and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue compared to no obesity (all p<0.05).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2bd1386550ea4541ffe96dhttps://doi.org/10.2337/db26-2075-p
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share