Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 7, 2026European Heart JournalOpen Access

This commentary discusses the rationale for evaluating cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with less severe heart failure, noting prior trials included 86-94% NYHA class III patients.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve outcomes in patients with less severe heart failure?

Population

Patients with heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, and a prolonged QRS complex, specifically…

Design

Editorial

Key result

This commentary discusses the rationale for evaluating cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with less severe heart failure, noting prior trials included 86-94% NYHA class III patients.

Authors

GBGünter Breithardt

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Key expert perspectives

Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.

AJArthur J. MossProfessor of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center

“Cardiac resynchronisation therapy was dramatically effective in this large study population, with a 34% reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality or heart failure. The benefit is dominated by a 41% reduction in heart failure events. This results validate a new indication for cardiac resynchronisation therapy in the prevention of heart failure in at-risk asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic cardiac patients. It seems likely that this preventive CRT-D therapy will have widespread application and utilisation.”

University of Rochester Medical CenterConference Coverage
RPRichard PagePresident, Heart Rhythm Society

“This is a very important trial. Previous studies have shown that the ICD saves lives. This trial demonstrates that in this population, an ICD with biventricular pacing can be expected also to improve clinical outcome as measured by hospitalization for heart failure. I anticipate that these results may improve acceptance of ICD therapy, both by patients and their physicians, in that the patient would not only live longer, but also would live better.”

Heart Rhythm SocietyNews Coverage
AJArthur J. MossProfessor of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center

“The findings from MADIT-CRT show that CRT-D effectively reduces the risk of heart failure. There is a very large population of patients with heart disease whom we believe will benefit from CRT-D therapy.”

University of Rochester Medical CenterNews Coverage

Overview

Supports extending CRT rationale to milder HF via remodeling; leaves open hard-outcome confirmation in NYHA I-II.

Key Points

  • To discuss the role of cardiac resynchronization therapy in managing heart failure among patients with different NYHA classes.
  • Analysis of randomized clinical trials like COMPANION and CARE-HF focusing on CRT efficacy in heart failure patients.
  • Comparison of patient demographics in CRT trials vs. ICD trials.
  • CRT improves symptoms and reduces hospitalizations in NYHA class III and IV heart failure patients.
  • Evidence suggests CRT may also benefit patients with less severe heart failure based on its cardiac remodeling effects.

Structured PICO

Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve outcomes in patients with less severe heart failure?

P
Population
Patients with heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, and a prolonged QRS complex, specifically focusing on those with less severe heart failure (NYHA class I-II).
I
Intervention
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)

This commentary discusses the rationale for extending cardiac resynchronization therapy to patients with less severe heart failure, as investigated in the MADIT-CRT trial.

Cite This Study

Günter Breithardt (2009) conducted an editorial in Heart failure. Cardiac resynchronization therapy was evaluated. This commentary discusses the rationale for evaluating cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with less severe heart failure, noting prior trials included 86-94% NYHA class III patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a24e32816581caae6d0dedehttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp383
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impact of Using Different Advanced Pacing Algorithms and Modalities on Improving the Efficacy and Response of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy2025
  2. 2Survival of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator: the RESET-CRT project2022 · 52 citations
  3. 3Patient‐specific modifiers of survival benefit in cardiac resynchronization therapy ‐ A multicentre interaction analysis2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4CRT-D or CRT-P: When There Is a Dilemma and How to Solve It2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5CRT-D or CRT-P: When There Is a Dilemma and How to Solve It2025 · 2 citations