Ventricular septal rupture with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction was associated with higher in-hospital mortality than predominant left ventricular failure (87% vs 61%, p<0.001).
Observational (n=939)
Does ventricular septal rupture compared to predominant left ventricular failure increase in-hospital mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction?
939 patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction, comparing 55 with ventricular septal rupture to 884 with predominant left ventricular failure.
Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) (n=55)
Predominant left ventricular failure (n=884)
In-hospital mortalityhard clinical
Ventricular septal rupture complicating acute MI with cardiogenic shock is associated with an extremely high in-hospital mortality (87%), significantly worse than shock from predominant LV failure, though surgery remains the best therapeutic option.
Absolute Event Rate: 87% vs 61%
p-value: p=<0.001
OBJECTIVES We wished to assess the profile and outcomes of patients with ventricular septal rupture (VSR) in the setting of cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (MI). BACKGROUND Cardiogenic shock is often seen with VSR complicating acute MI. Despite surgical therapy, mortality in such patients is high. METHODS We analyzed 939 patients enrolled in the SHOCK Trial Registry of CS in acute infarction, comparing 55 patients whose shock was associated with VSR with 884 patients who had predominant left ventricular failure. RESULTS Rupture occurred a median 16 h after infarction. Patients with VSR tended to be older (p = 0.053), were more often female (p = 0.002) and less often had previous infarction (p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.015) or smoking history (p = 0.033). They also underwent right-heart catheterization, intra-aortic balloon pumping and bypass surgery significantly more often. Although patients with rupture had less severe coronary disease, their in-hospital mortality was higher (87% vs. 61%, p < 0.001). Surgical repair was performed in 31 patients with rupture (21 had concomitant bypass surgery); 6 (19%) survived. Of the 24 patients managed medically, only 1 survived. CONCLUSIONS There is a high in-hospital mortality rate when CS develops as a result of VSR. Ventricular septal rupture may occur early after infarction, and women and the elderly may be more susceptible. Although the prognosis is poor, surgery remains the best therapeutic option in this setting.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Venu Menon
Cleveland Clinic
John G. Webb
Valve (United States)
L. David Hillis
Evolved Analytics (United States)
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Columbia University
University of British Columbia
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Menon et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (n=939). Ventricular septal rupture vs. Predominant left ventricular failure was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=<0.001). Ventricular septal rupture with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction was associated with higher in-hospital mortality than predominant left ventricular failure (87% vs 61%, p<0.001).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a243a64ee4ed919607e64e7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00878-0
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: