Comprehensive survey reveals evaluation gaps in artificial intelligence, highlighting the need for robust assessments.
The rapid emergence of generative and agentic artificial intelligence (AI) has outpaced traditional evaluation practices. While large language models excel on static language benchmarks, real-world deployment demands more than accuracy on curated tasks. Agentic systems use planning, tool invocation, memory, and multi-agent collaboration to perform complex workflows. Enterprise adoption therefore hinges on holistic assessments that include cost, latency, reliability, safety, and multi-agent coordination. This survey provides a comprehensive taxonomy of evaluation dimensions, reviews existing benchmarks for generative and agentic systems, identifies gaps between laboratory tests and production requirements, and proposes future directions for more realistic, multi-dimensional benchmarking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manmohan Shukla (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: